|
|
Submitted
on July 20, 2005 by Jan Willem Dorst
Question: Hi,
Quick question:
I would like to use a removable furling (non reefing) gear such as the Profurl
EC range as an inner forestay to deal with medium to heavy weather conditions
instead of the regular forestay. Our boat is only 32 feet, so being able to remove
the inner stay would be very practical when deck space is needed. And having
the option of 'storing' the inner stay sail outside of the boat frees up space
inside when needed.
In your opinion (or even better: in your experience), will such a gear combined
with a suitably designed and constructed sail (double, low stretch luff rope)
really be able to deal with the loads imposed on it and manage to keep the sail's
luff tight and the sail flattened when sailing upwind?
Thanks,
Jan Willem Dorst
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Answer: Hi
Jan,
The furling gear will be able to handle the loads of an inner staysail.
The tough question to answer is whether you will be able to get enough
headstay tension
to have an effective sail for upwind sailing. If you have a very stiff mast,
a position on the deck far enough forward and a 2:1 Vectran halyard with good
separation from the primary headstay, then you will be happy with the headstay
tension. You can use a double luff rope or a soft stay like the Future Fibers
product. The latter will give better performance in terms of low stretch and
less luff flutter, but it costs a lot more.
Regards,
Dan Neri
Follow-up questions:
Question 1: What is the
relevance of the forward enough position on the deck? Is Dan assuming
that I will be using one
halyard
for both
the primary and 'inner' forestay? Does the angle of the inner stay influence
the ability to tension it? Here's the setup I have in mind: the 'inner
forestay' will have it's own dedicated 2:1 halyard. The position on the
deck would be about 4 feet behind the primary forestay deck position
(total distance on deck between primary forestay and mast foot is about
12 feet), similar to a cutter conguration position, but not intended
to be used with both sails hoisted as in a real cutter rig. The inner
forestay will run more or less parallel to the primary forestay, at the
same angle in other words. Mast length above deck is approx. 37 feet.
It's a masthead type rig where the halyard of the primary forestay exits
the mast at the very top. The mast is extremely stiff. I will be adding
running backstays to support the iner forestay.
Answer 1: The more vertical the stay is, the more force it will require
to reduce the sag. So, ignoring any other issues ( like sail size, interference
with other parts
of the boat, location of bulkhead, cost of moving parts on the mast ) you would
want to push the attachment on the deck farther forward and move the attachment
on the mast further down to minimize the sag in the stay. Your setup sounds about
right. The running backstay will help even though you have a very stiff rig.
With out the running backstay you will probably find that the mast tends to pump
as the boat develops a rhythm sailing into waves. A pumping rig allows the sail
shape to change with each cycle and also leads to fatigue at rigging terminals.
Question 2: What is meant exactly
by 'good separation' from the primary forestay? Does Dan simply
want to emphasize that the two systems (primary and inner) must
be
setup in such a way that one cannot get caught in the other when hoisting and
dousing the stay sail? Or is there a more specific technical point that he is
trying to make?
Answer 2: Moving the stays apart at the top
helps simply because, with more separation, you can apply load to the inner stay
without
having to simultaneously increasing
the load on the forward stay. Some short-handed race boats were built in the
late 80s-early 90s with two stays very close together and neither of them would
ever be sufficiently tensioned because they shared the backstay load. The only
way to make a "twin headstay" boat work was to have long hydraulic
rams attached to each stay under the deck allowing one stay to be relaxed when
the other was tensioned.
Question 3: Can you give an internet address for the
Future Fibers product that Dan mentions.
I am unfamiliar with it.
Answer 3: www.futurefibres.co.uk/flash/default.asp
Sorry to bother you with the additional questions. But good advice is hard to
come by!
Thank you,
Jan William Dorst
Email North
Sails with your question today!
<<Go BACK to Solutions
for Sailors Main Page.
|